September 11, 2016

Ofwat will not ‘hand-hold’ water firms through PR19

Ofwat will not hand-hold water companies through the next price review – PR19 – and will be “raising the bar” on the quality of their business plans. Ofwat chief executive Cathryn Ross The regulator’s chief executive Cathryn Ross said that, during the last price review – PR14 –

Read More »

Opec learns from central banking

©AFP Central bankers have long understood that a few well-placed words can wield nearly as much power as pulling the actual levers of monetary policy. It is a lesson that Opec and Saudi Arabia has started to heed. Just a few short sentences from Saudi Arabia’s energy minister Khalid al-Falih

Read More »

Taylor Wimpey shrugs off Brexit fears

Shares in Taylor Wimpey rose more than 5 per cent on Tuesday morning after the UK housebuilder upgraded its profit guidance and said it would boost its dividend payout. The FTSE 100 construction group, one of Britain’s biggest housebuilders, said ahead of an investor day that it was confident in

Read More »
Latest Issue
Issue 324 : Jan 2025

September 11, 2016

Response to protest planned for RIBA Stirling Prize event at 66 Portland Place on 15 October by Architects for Social Housing (ASH)

Browser does not support script. Contact us A group called Architects for Social Housing (ASH) is planning a protest about the inclusion of NEO Bankside on the RIBA Stirling Prize shortlist. “The RIBA has met with representatives of ASH to hear their concerns and to ensure that appropriate security measures are in place for protestors and guests. The RIBA Stirling Prize plays its part in driving up the standards of buildings across all sectors. The shortlist this year demonstrates this with a fine example of social housing for Peabody as well as the private sector-led development of Neo Bankside. It includes a cancer care centre in one of the poorest parts of the UK, alongside a comprehensive school in Wandsworth and university/public buildings in Manchester and Greenwich. The lack of clarity on social housing requirements is one of the many failings of our broken housing market. The government needs to set out a clear plan for solving the housing crisis. In particular, there is an urgent need to address the dire lack of affordable housing in many of our towns and cities. At NEO Bankside, the clients have worked within the current legal framework to deliver a high-quality housing scheme that is deserving of its place on the RIBA Stirling Prize shortlist; the clients have also agreed the required social housing elements with Southwark on various sites around the borough.” ENDS Posted on Thursday 15th October 2015 Source link

Read More »

Ofwat will not ‘hand-hold’ water firms through PR19

Ofwat will not hand-hold water companies through the next price review – PR19 – and will be “raising the bar” on the quality of their business plans. Ofwat chief executive Cathryn Ross The regulator’s chief executive Cathryn Ross said that, during the last price review – PR14 – companies achieved a lot, but there was “rather more iteration and hand-holding than we had initially expected”. Speaking at the Moody’s UK Water Sector conference in London, Ross told delegates this was “the right thing to do”, but is not something the regulator plans to repeat in PR19. She said Ofwat would be asking companies to “take ownership of their plans to a much greater extent”. “In PR19, we will be simultaneously raising the bar on the quality of plans and reducing the extent to which, during the review, we help companies to get over that bar,” she added. “We are moving from four separate price controls in PR14 to six. “And while we expect this will enable us to take a more targeted approach to our regulation from 2025, it means we have a lot to do in PR19 and we have a lower budget to do it. So we will need to take a more focussed approach in deploying our resources. “It is also entirely in line with companies taking ownership of their plans, and companies and their investors bearing the risk associated with the quality of those plans.” In the same speech, Ross said the cost-benefit review of household competition, which Ofwat was asked by the government to carry out, had “left her feeling as though we have a long way to go” on “genuinely excellent” customer service in the sector. “The sector has done a great job over past couple of decades at improving operational levels of customer service, in terms of supply interruptions, sewer flooding, water quality and environmental improvements,” she said. “And it has done a lot to improve on the hygiene factors of the customer experience, for example in terms of responding to enquiries and complaints. “The regulatory regime in the past has, understandably and quite rightly, focused on getting the basics right, and companies have responded. “But … if you look at the sort of innovation in services and customer experience that have happened and continue to happen in competitive markets, I think we – all of us, Ofwat and companies – should be looking for more stretch here, and a more dynamic approach.” Source link

Read More »

Opec learns from central banking

©AFP Central bankers have long understood that a few well-placed words can wield nearly as much power as pulling the actual levers of monetary policy. It is a lesson that Opec and Saudi Arabia has started to heed. Just a few short sentences from Saudi Arabia’s energy minister Khalid al-Falih last week sent hedge funds scrambling to cover large bets against the oil price, subsequently propelling Brent crude 10 per cent higher and largely silencing fears the market was on the cusp of another rout. More On this topic IN Commodities Following calls from Venezuela for big producers to revisit the idea of freezing output, Mr Falih said the kingdom was willing to “discuss any possible action” needed “to stabilise” prices when Opec ministers gather informally at a conference next month. For those that had written off Opec and Saudi Arabia’s position as “the central bank of oil” the market’s reaction was notable. Most long-term Opec watchers expect no official agreement to emerge from the Algeria gathering, even as oil-dependent economies struggle under the weight of a two-year price collapse. Still, prices shot higher at the mere threat of action. “A lot of traders appear to hold the view that eventually there’s going to be so much pain among Opec that they’ll have to do something,” says Jamie Webster of Columbia University’s Center on Global Energy Policy. “I don’t see anything to make me think outcome is going to be different this time.” Instead, analysts see an attempt by Opec and Saudi Arabia to verbally intervene in the market during the long process of bringing supply and demand back towards balance, as they stick with the policy of keeping output high to squeeze out higher cost rivals. That Saudi-led effort, in place since late 2014, is starting to show signs of working. Opec production has risen to its highest on record and supplies outside the group are expected to fall this year. However, the process is taking time, leaving the oil price vulnerable to attacks from short-sellers when seasonal surpluses emerge, as they did recently in refined fuels markets like gasoline. Where once Opec might have cut output, verbally intervening is now the preferred option. “By raising the possibility of a freeze it can help them get through this period while the rebalancing continues,” says Ann-Louise Hittle, chief analyst at Wood Mackenzie. “It’s almost as if there’s an attempt to talk the market through what was always going to be a long process.” The reason last week’s Saudi comments pushed Brent up so much largely reflects market positioning, say traders. Alarmed by the emerging gasoline glut, hedge funds bet aggressively on lower prices in July, leaving the market primed for buying back and closing out bearish bets. Mr Falih blamed “large short positions” for prices undershooting. The biggest barrier to Saudi Arabia taking more decisive action is its relationship with fellow Opec member Iran. Saudi Arabia has always said that it is willing to consider anything to help balance the market, including production cuts, but only if other big suppliers join in. Russia, the biggest oil exporter outside Opec, agreed to such a deal in April in Doha but Saudi Arabia scuppered the deal at the last minute, when Deputy Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman — the favoured son of the king — ruled there could be no agreement without Iran. A senior Gulf Opec source says the kingdom believed Russia’s recent remarks about potential involvement were positive for any collaborative efforts that were being led by Qatar, Venezuela and Algeria. However he acknowledges Iran’s position was still uncertain. After years of sanctions Iran is attempting to win back lost market share and has repeatedly signalled it has no plans to limit output. Iran’s oil minister Bijan Zangeneh said on Thursday he had not decided if he would attend September’s gathering, according to media reports. “Iran will remain a stumbling block as it simply cannot accept a ceiling on its production,” says Amrita Sen, chief analyst at London-based consultancy Energy Aspects. Like Iran, Saudi Arabia has also been increasing production, reaching a record 10.7m b/d day in July, up from 10.2m b/d in January when the idea of a freeze was first mooted. The country’s crude output normally rises in the summer months to meet peak electricity consumption but in his comments to the Saudi Press Agency last week Mr Falih also pointed to “strong demand for its crude” as a reason for its record production. For some, that remark was significant because it indicates a greater willingness to keep the taps wide open as its competition with Iran heats up. “If the talks fail, which is likely, the market should not entirely rule out the possibility that Saudi Arabia will give up and throw in the towel, and keep output high, at or above July’s level,” says Mrs Sen. Investors may need to wait to see if the Kingdom does scale back its summer output as it has done it previous year. But if it keeps producing 10.7m b/d or more than the oil market may not come into balance next year as most analysts currently expect. It would be a test, analysts say, of the power of verbal intervention to keep the bears at bay. At some point words may need to be backed by action. Emmanuel Ibe Kachikwu, Nigeria’s oil minister told CNN this week that he was “not optimistic” about any production cuts in September. “we’ve tried that a couple of times and I think we’ve not been able to get the unity we need.” He says it was important nonetheless to maintain dialogue with non-Opec producers Ms Hittle at Wood Mackenzie adds in many ways Opec and Saudi Arabia’s trajectory was not that different from most central banks in the post-financial crisis world, who have often delayed adjusting interest rates. “It used to be that they were compared to a central bank as they would take action. Now, like many central banks, guidance has

Read More »

Taylor Wimpey shrugs off Brexit fears

Shares in Taylor Wimpey rose more than 5 per cent on Tuesday morning after the UK housebuilder upgraded its profit guidance and said it would boost its dividend payout. The FTSE 100 construction group, one of Britain’s biggest housebuilders, said ahead of an investor day that it was confident in its business “against the backdrop of a strong, growing housing market”. It shrugged off concerns about a slowdown in sales in the run-up to the June 23 referendum on Britain’s EU membership. The company lifted its guidance on operating profit margins to 22 per cent for the period between 2016 and 2018, and said that it would increase its total dividend payout for 2017 by 26 per cent to £450m, or 13.8p per share, subject to shareholder approval. In 2015, the housebuilder’s operating profit margin was 20.3 per cent and its total dividend payout was 11p per share. “The UK newbuild housing market remains very positive across most of our geographies, with a healthy and controlled lending environment providing good accessibility to mortgages at competitive rates,” the company said on Tuesday. “Consumer demand and confidence remain high. In central London, the market continues to be stable.” Last month, Taylor Wimpey reported its order book was up 7.5 per cent from the same time last year to 8,811 and its total value had increased by 16.6 per cent to £2.2bn. Despite listed estate agents Countrywide, Savills and Foxtons warning of a short-term downturn in transactions as a result of referendum uncertainty, Taylor Wimpey also said last month that its trading had been unaffected by the forthcoming vote. Pete Redfern, chief executive, said the housebuilder was “well equipped to react to any potential changes in the market that may be caused by the EU referendum”. But Standard & Poor’s has said that a vote for Britain to leave the EU in next month’s referendum would carry the “greatest risk” for Taylor Wimpey and other construction groups with large exposure to London. Taylor Wimpey has around 30 per cent of its current building projects in and around the capital. Jefferies equity analyst Anthony Codling said, however, that Taylor Wimpey’s statement on Tuesday “highlighted today how fundamentally strong the demand for new homes is”. “Even before the first referendum vote is cast, the group set out plans today to return a total of £1.3bn of dividends over the next three years,” Mr Codling said. “Today’s announcement puts a marker in the ground that it will continue to supply a significant number of much-needed homes, irrespective of the underlying economic backdrop over the medium term and if it does the shareholders which back it will be handsomely rewarded.” Taylor Wimpey is not the only confident construction group. One of the housebuilder’s biggest competitors, Bovis Homes, also brushed off worries of a pre-referendum slowdown last week, saying the poll had “no discernible impact” on its business. Source link

Read More »