Schindler X8 wins prestigious Red Dot Award and iF DESIGN AWARD
The Schindler X8 elevator has received two coveted international product design awards in recognition of its outstanding aesthetic design. The Schindler X8 has won two of the world’s most respected seals of design quality: a Red Dot Award: Product Design 2026 and an iF DESIGN AWARD 2026. The Schindler X8 impressed international design experts with its approach to residential elevator design, rethinking how an elevator looks and feels inside the home. It moves away from the traditional image of an elevator as a functional, industrial product and transforms it into a piece of contemporary design that can blend seamlessly into a building’s architecture and interior. Created for homes and residential buildings, the Schindler X8 incorporates minimalist doors, carefully designed interior packages and a clean aesthetic that brings warmth, simplicity and visual harmony to vertical mobility. The result is an elevator that is not only functional but also an integrated part of the living environment. “We are extremely proud to win two highly respected international design awards,” said Amanda Driehorst, Strategy and Sales Manager, Business Innovation Team, Schindler. “A great deal of emphasis was placed on the aesthetic and emotional aspect of the Schindler X8, something that has not always been given priority in elevator design. The Schindler X8 is not just a functional piece of equipment. It has been created to feel like it belongs in your home.” Seamless design The Schindler X8’s interior design was created to express the unseen innovation behind the platform through a completely new design language. The Schindler X8 represents a new way of thinking about residential elevator design. Traditionally, elevators have often been defined by visible technical components, metallic frames, wall buttons and finishes that can feel clinical and out of place in a home. With the X8, Schindler set out to create a welcoming and more cohesive design style. Its signature doors blend striking simplicity with intelligent design, while the minimalist aesthetic allows the elevator to integrate into interiors with the same level of consideration as other high-end design items in the home. “The main mission of the interior design was to communicate the revolution happening in the platform, that passengers cannot see,” said Germana Lunghi, Product Owner, Interior Design, Schindler. “We wanted to break the standard archetype of the elevator as a stainless-steel cage that moves up and down, and instead treat it as part of the architecture, a real room inside the building.” A design for every home The aesthetic focus continues inside the Schindler X8, with six distinct interior packages. Each design has been inspired by nature and created to bring a different atmosphere to the space. The collection includes Luna, a timeless and refined look; Mineral, an open and natural feel; Savanna, a bright and earthy space; Terra, a sleek and fascinating aesthetic; Forest, a warm and rich ambiance; and Volcano, an intense and modern finish. Each interior uses different materials, color palettes, tactile finishes and lighting treatments that allow the elevator to harmonize with various residential environments. All six designs are available with full-mirror, half-mirror or no-mirror configurations, giving homeowners and designers a simple but elegant design experience. “The Schindler X8 was developed to blend into residential environments with the same design quality as the rest of the home,” said Germana. “If you are moving from your bedroom or living room into the elevator, the experience should feel seamless. We took inspiration from other objects found in contemporary homes to turn a functional product into a design item.” Form and function Behind the Schindler X8’s award-winning aesthetic is an innovative elevator concept that gives architects, designers and homeowners far greater freedom. Unlike traditional elevator systems, the Schindler X8 does not require a concrete shaft, pit or headroom. Instead, it needs only a single wall cut-out and operates via a standard single-phase power outlet. This flexibility allows the Schindler X8 to be integrated into almost any space in both new homes and existing residential buildings. “For decades, elevators have shaped the way buildings are designed, but with the Schindler X8 we set out to change this,” said Amanda. “The technical innovation enables the design freedom, which means the elevator can be installed in a way that is much more sympathetic to the architecture and interior design of the home.” Outstanding design quality The Red Dot Award is presented for high design quality, with the international jury recognizing the Schindler X8 in a strong field of participants, from 61 countries, for its outstanding design and quality. There were more than 10,000 entries in the iF DESIGN AWARD 2026, from 4,837 participants across 68 countries, judged by 129 international jurors. The Schindler X8 received the award in the Product Design, Building Technology category. It was assessed against criteria including idea, form, function, differentiation and sustainability. The double award success recognizes the Schindler X8 as a breakthrough in residential elevator design that combines elegant aesthetics, architectural freedom and Schindler’s high standards of quality and reliability. “The response to the Schindler X8 has been overwhelmingly positive,” concluded Amanda. “People immediately notice the doors, the interiors and the way the elevator becomes part of the home. These awards are a fantastic recognition of the work that has gone into creating an elevator that is completely different from anything else on the market.” Building, Design & Construction Magazine | The Choice of Industry Professionals
FMB members across the UK mark 85 years of raising standards in construction
As the Federation of Master Builders marks its 85th anniversary, members from across the UK reflect on the businesses, communities and industry the FMB has helped shape over the past eight decades. From Glasgow to Cheltenham, builders reflect on eight decades of craft, community and change as the Federation of Master Builders reaches a landmark 85 year anniversary The Federation of Master Builders (FMB) is marking its 85th anniversary this year and members from every corner of the UK are reflecting on what those eight decades have meant for their businesses, their trade and the people they build for. Founded in 1941, the FMB was established on a simple but enduring principle: that skilled, reputable builders deserved a voice, and that consumers deserved protection. Today, it remains the UK’s largest trade association for small and medium-sized building companies, championing high standards in an industry that continues to face significant challenges — from a deepening skills shortage and planning delays to the ongoing scourge of rogue traders who cost British homeowners an estimated £14.3 billion over the last five years alone. As the FMB looks ahead to its National Conference at Oxford’s historic Exeter College on 9–10 July, members who have been part of the organisation for decades — and those who joined more recently — are united by a shared commitment to the values that have defined the FMB since its founding. Brian Berry, Chief Executive of the Federation of Master Builders: “Eighty-five years ago, the Federation of Master Builders was founded on a simple but powerful idea: that skilled, trustworthy builders deserved a voice, and that the public deserved protection from those who would undermine the trade. That mission is as urgent today as it ever was. As we mark this anniversary, I’m proud of everything our members have built, not just the homes, extensions and renovations that have transformed people’s lives, but the standards, the reputation and the community that the FMB represents. Here’s to the next 85 years.” To mark the milestone, the FMB spoke to members past and present across the UK, asking them to reflect on their time with the Federation, the changes they’ve seen in the industry, and what membership means to their business today — and looking ahead to the challenges still to come. NORTH — I J Curry & Son Ltd, Penrith, Cumbria | In business since 1990 | FMB members for nearly 30 years For the Curry family, joining the FMB was about standing for something in an industry where standards are not always guaranteed. “Building is a people business,” says Nick Curry, “and we wanted our customers to know that we were committed to doing things properly and working to the highest standards.” The firm has been building in Cumbria since 1990 — 35 years of barn conversions, new builds and renovations across the region. Over nearly three decades as FMB members, the industry has changed beyond recognition: customer expectations are higher, sustainability and energy efficiency have moved centre stage, and technology has transformed everything from how plans are drawn up to how sites are managed. But Nick is clear that some things remain constant: “Despite all the changes, the importance of craftsmanship and trust has remained.” For a family firm now spanning three generations — Nick, his father Ian who first joined the FMB nearly 30 years ago, and Joan — multi-generational working is something they’ve had to navigate in practice. “The key is communication and recognising that nobody has all the answers,” says Nick. “Family businesses thrive when there’s mutual respect, clear roles and a shared vision for where the business is going.” The FMB has been part of that journey every step of the way. The Currys’ proudest achievement to date is being recognised with two national Master Builder Awards last year, alongside a string of regional wins. “It’s reassuring to know that we’re part of something bigger than our own business.” MIDLANDS — Graline Construction Ltd, Solihull, Birmingham | In business since 1974 | FMB members since 1995 Graline Construction has been one of South Birmingham’s leading family-run builders since 1974 — over 50 years of craftsmanship in kitchens, extensions and renovations across the region. But for Director of Operations Kathryn Poppitt, the FMB story is personal as much as professional. She now sits as the FMB Central Area Board President and serves as a Vice President of the regional FMB board. Her father joined the Federation in 1995 — when the company had already been trading for over two decades — because he wanted the credibility of a professional body behind the Graline name. Thirty years later, that commitment has passed to the next generation. “I feel like I’ve grown up with the FMB. My dad joined in 1995 because he wanted credibility behind our company and wanted to raise standards in an industry he’d worked in since he was 15. Being part of the Federation has been part of my childhood and is now a huge part of my business journey too.” LONDON — JA Lofts, South East London | FMB members for 10 years Jordan Ali started JA Lofts a decade ago with a clear intention: to stand out in a crowded market by holding himself to the highest standards. The South East London-based loft conversion specialist joined the FMB on day one — and has recently taken that commitment further by joining the London Board. “Happy 85th FMB! When I started my company I wanted to stand out from the crowd and hold myself to high standards so signed up with the FMB right away. I recently was elected to the London Board so am looking forward to making a contribution to the direction the FMB takes — particularly on bringing the next generation into the industry. Here’s to the FMB raising standards for many years to come!” SOUTH WEST — Newman Construction and Sons Ltd, Cheltenham, Gloucestershire | FMB members since 2019 Newman Construction and Sons Ltd may be a
Employer confidence is critical to construction skills package success, NAO says
The government’s ambitions to build 1.5 million homes, upgrade home energy standards, and deliver a £725 billion long-term infrastructure pipeline will depend on a significant expansion to the construction workforce – and stronger employer involvement in training the next generation of workers, according to a new report from the National Audit Office (NAO) published today. The watchdog examined the government’s progress in delivering its £625 million construction skills package, announced in March 2025, which aims to support up to 60,000 more construction workers by 2029.1 The package combines tried and tested initiatives, alongside newer initiatives, including Skills Bootcamps, and new foundation apprenticeships, and construction technical excellence colleges. However, the package is not designed to meet all future workforce needs, with government estimates showing that between 201,000 and 755,000 extra workers could be required by 2030, before accounting for those who leave the sector for other jobs. This comes as statistics show the construction sector had the highest rate of hard-to-fill vacancies due to skills shortages — 45% compared with a 27% national average.2 Employer engagement is a critical delivery risk for the construction package. The government hopes that 42% of the additional construction workers will follow from further education students completing industry placements. Businesses make recruitment and training decisions depending on the expected pipeline of work, costs and market competition – but tough economic conditions are affecting employers’ confidence to invest and take new employees and apprentices on board. In 2024, employer investment in training per construction trainee was at its lowest level in 10 years. Foundation apprenticeships are intended to help young people move into entry-level construction jobs, but by April 2026 only 74 young people had started, against DWP’s assumption of 1,000 in 2025-26. The NAO concludes that the government’s construction skills package is a positive step, and that it now has in place a clearer framework to track delivery. However, delivery is not guaranteed. To achieve its aspiration of up to 60,000 workers — and support its housing and infrastructure commitments — government will need better data, to prioritise resources, and to get employers’ buy in. Without this, skills shortages could drive up costs and put major delivery commitments at risk. The NAO now recommends: Gareth Davies, head of the NAO, said:“The government is taking action to address shortage of skilled construction workers as part of its ambitious commitments for housing, infrastructure and energy efficiency. Success will depend on employers having the confidence and capability to offer placements, apprenticeships and jobs.” Building, Design & Construction Magazine | The Choice of Industry Professionals
Almost a quarter of landlords ready to quit the rental market over Making Tax Digital burden
New research from Landlord Studio reveals the toll MTD is taking on the UK’s landlords, as they increasingly look to rely on letting agents to make sense of the shift New research from Landlord Studio, the property accounting and compliance software company, finds that almost a quarter (22%) of UK landlords have considered leaving the rental market altogether, as Making Tax Digital (MTD) piles on administrative and compliance pressure. Despite this, 74% of landlords agree that MTD is actually making it easier to manage their tax, and over half (55%) still expect MTD to increase their profitability overall. The findings also point to a growing role for letting agents, with 90% of landlords agreeing that agents are well-equipped to help them manage MTD requirements. MTD for Income Tax has been mandatory since April 2026 for landlords earning over £50,000 in qualifying income, requiring quarterly digital updates to HMRC alongside an end-of-year finalisation process. The threshold drops further to £30,000 from April 2027, bringing a second wave of landlords into scope within the next year. The confidence paradox While confidence in MTD is high, many landlords are still feeling the strain of rising admin demands. Despite 94% of landlords and letting agents combined saying they are confident in their understanding of MTD requirements, and 95% confident in their ability to implement it, 59% of landlords specifically remain concerned about making mistakes or facing penalties. Letting agents appear well placed to help close this gap, with 51% describing themselves as very confident in their understanding of MTD, compared with just 36% of landlords. This suggests agents can help close the gap between broad landlord confidence and the practical realities of staying compliant. Logan Ransley, Co-Founder of Landlord Studio, said: “Landlords are clearly feeling the pressure of MTD, both in terms of time and cost, and for some that pressure is serious enough to make them question whether continuing to let property is worth it. What’s clear is that the support landlords need is often already there. Letting agents have the knowledge and the relationships to make a real difference, but our research shows many landlords simply don’t know how much help is on offer. Closing this gap is going to be essential as MTD rolls out more broadly.” The race to stay compliant is borne out in the numbers. Landlords now spend an average of 13 hours a month – more than a day and a half of work – managing tax and financial admin. Compared with 12 months ago, 53% both say the time associated with this has increased and the cost has risen. On average, landlords estimate that the time they spend on tax and financial admin is worth more than £3,000 a year, almost £64 a week. The admin burden isn’t only being felt by landlords. 89% say rising admin and compliance costs make them likely to raise rents, showing the knock-on effect inefficient back-office processes can have across the rental market. Falling behind on technology The research suggests that while landlords broadly recognise the benefits of digital tax reporting, many are still grappling with having the right tools to manage compliance efficiently. Just 34% use software or digital platforms for tax reporting and record-keeping, while 39% continue to rely on spreadsheets or manual methods. Spreadsheets are technically permitted under MTD, but only with separate bridging software and strict digital links in place, an extra layer of complexity many landlords may not have accounted for. A growing opportunity for agents Landlords identified the biggest compliance challenges as keeping accurate records (38%), the risk of errors and penalties (36%), and the time required for admin (34%). They also recognise that letting agents are well-equipped to help them manage new tax requirements (90%), but with 61% of letting agents themselves admitting that awareness of the support they can offer remains low, there is a clear opportunity to close that gap. Letting agents have the ability to provide landlords with practical support, helping them improve processes, stay organised and reduce the risk of mistakes. There is also strong future demand for digital solutions, with 98% of landlords saying they are likely to invest in tax and compliance software over the next two years, with 44% looking for greater financial visibility. For letting agents, this creates an opportunity to combine their expertise with digital tools, helping landlords stay compliant, reduce admin and manage rental income more efficiently as MTD implementation accelerates. Logan Ransley adds: “Letting agents already hold the rent, expense and ownership data their landlords need to comply with MTD – what’s been missing is a way to get that data to HMRC without anyone re-entering it by hand. That’s exactly why we built Nexus by Landlord Studio. It connects the records an agency already keeps to a secure portal where landlords, or their accountants, can review and submit each quarter. Nexus is available exclusively through participating letting agents, so an agent’s relationship with their landlords becomes a genuine value-add rather than another compliance headache.” To find out more about Nexus by Landlord Studio, visit here. Building, Design & Construction Magazine | The Choice of Industry Professionals
Government agency achieves a world-first in providing ‘exceptional workplace experiences’
The Government Property Agency’s (GPA) Birmingham hub has become the first public sector building in the world to retain a coveted quality mark. Its flagship site at 23 Stephenson Street has secured Leesman+ accreditation – a prestigious global workplace experience rating – for the second time, demonstrating a sustained commitment to delivering an exceptional workplace experience for civil servants. Carly Ersser, Director of Workplace Services at the GPA, said: “We are incredibly proud that 23 Stephenson Street has secured Leesman+ accreditation for a second time. Surveying the people who work from our buildings gives us invaluable insights that directly inform how we design our services and continuously improve the workplace experience. “While this historic milestone is a fantastic achievement, we recognise there is always more work to be done. This rigorous feedback helps us target our resources to where they are needed most, ensuring we make a meaningful difference to civil servants working productively and happily from the office.” Leesman+ is a globally recognised certification awarded to top-tier workplaces that achieve outstanding employee satisfaction scores. To earn the accreditation, buildings must undergo rigorous, independent surveying and analysis of their features, services, and infrastructure. The GPA government hub at Stephenson Street first achieved this benchmark in 2023. The Birmingham office hosts 1,700 civil servants from more than 20 government departments and agencies. It was transformed from disused retail and commercial space into a modern, digitally-connected, and inclusive workplace in 2022, and now features a variety of spaces to support productivity, collaboration and wellbeing aligned to the Government Workplace Design Guide. Dr Peggie Rothe, Chief Insights and Research Officer at Leesman, said: “Leesman+ certifications have been awarded to just three per cent of the more than 10,400 buildings Leesman has assessed worldwide, and only 10 per cent of those have been re-certified. The GPA’s Stephenson Street Hub is the only public sector building globally to achieve Leesman+ re-certification, testament to the agency’s programmatic, data-led approach to delivering and sustaining exceptional workplace experience.” Building, Design & Construction Magazine | The Choice of Industry Professionals
Self-Lay Versus Water Company Connections: The Real Cost and Time Comparison
Every new development that needs a water main faces the same early fork in the road. The developer can requisition the main from the incumbent water company and wait for it to be built by others, or the developer can appoint an accredited self-lay provider to carry out the contestable construction while the water company retains its regulatory role and eventually adopts the finished network. Most developers reach for the first option by default, because it is the one the water company puts in front of them. The second is often the one that protects the programme, and understanding why means understanding how the cost and the timeline actually break down. Where the two routes actually differ The confusion usually starts with the word “cost”, because a new water connection is never a single price. The water company’s own charges are fixed and published in its annual charging arrangements: an infrastructure charge levied per property and a connection charge that varies with surface type, pipe size and who carries out the dig. Those figures are the same whichever route a developer takes, and they are public, so there is nothing to negotiate. The variable part is the construction, the physical work of getting a main to and across the site. This is the contestable element, and it is the only part of the equation where the route genuinely changes the outcome. Ofwat’s guidance on self-lay is explicit that a provider accredited under the Water Industry Registration Scheme can carry out contestable works across any water company’s area without having to satisfy twenty-two separate sets of local requirements. When that work is done by an accredited provider rather than the water company, the developer pays the contestable rate rather than the water company’s own delivery rate. There is a second, less-understood cost mechanism worth knowing. Until 2020 the water company made an asset payment to the developer or provider when it adopted a self-laid main. For new schemes in England that ended on 1 April 2020, and the value is now recognised through an income offset against the infrastructure charge instead. It is not money in hand any more, but it is a real reduction against a published charge, and it applies specifically to the self-lay route. Time is the variable that actually bites On a live development, the water company’s delivery timeline is a dependency the developer does not control. Design approval, scheduling and gang availability all sit inside another organisation’s programme, and they are rarely aligned to a housebuilder’s build sequence. A self-lay provider installs to the developer’s programme, coordinating the main and services around the groundworks rather than waiting for a slot. That is where weeks come out of a scheme, and it is why self-lay tends to earn its keep on multi-plot sites, on schemes that need genuinely new mains, and anywhere a shared utility trench helps the wider programme. For a single short connection in soft ground the coordination overhead may outweigh the saving, and it is worth being honest about that rather than pretending self-lay always wins. The water companies themselves frame the two routes this way. Thames Water’s self-lay overview tells developers plainly that the right installer “might not be us”, that independent providers may offer more flexible timescales and multiple-utility installation, and that because it is required to provide connections at cost, it makes no profit from new water mains. The choice, in other words, is not being sold against by the incumbent. It is a genuine programme decision the developer is expected to make. Adoption is the part that has to be designed in The mechanics of the handover matter here too. Once the pipework is laid, chlorinated, pressure tested and connected, the water company adopts it under a legal agreement made under Section 51A of the Water Industry Act 1991, the adoption provision inserted by the Water Act 2003 and in force since 2004. The agreement is signed by all three parties, the developer, the provider and the water company, before construction starts, and the standards, inspections and materials that make the network adoptable have to be built in from the first day on site. Since 2021 that process has run under Ofwat’s Code for Adoption, a common set of rules binding water companies in England, which replaced the older self-lay code of practice. This is precisely why the accreditation behind the provider matters more than the day rate. A network built to the wrong standard does not get adopted, and an unadopted main is a liability that sits with the developer. A provider offering self-lay water services, such as the Welwyn Garden City contractor McFadden Utilities, will typically carry the scheme end to end, from the point-of-connection enquiry through installation, chlorination, pressure testing, final connection and the handover paperwork that supports adoption, which removes the interface risk of splitting design, build and adoption across three parties. What developers should actually compare A like-for-like comparison is not “self-lay price versus water company price”. It is a comparison of total programme risk against a construction saving plus an income offset. The published water company charges are constant. The contestable construction is where the money moves, the programme is where the value sits, and the point-of-connection enquiry, which is usually free, is the single most useful early move on either route. It tells the developer where the connection will be made and flags any network reinforcement before a design is committed, which is what stops a late and expensive surprise. For contractors and developers weighing the two routes, the practical conclusion is unglamorous but consistent. The water company charges are what they are. The saving on contestable construction, and the income offset that comes with adoption, are worth having but are not the whole story. The story is who controls the programme, and on any scheme where the build sequence matters, that is the comparison worth running first.